DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda CX-5 vs 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeLand Rover
CX-5ModelRange Rover Evoque
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
202 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
380 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank60 lt
5,4 ltUrban consumption6,0 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4555 mmLength4355 mm
1840 mmWidth1965 mm
1710 mmHeight1635 mm
1445 KgWeight1625 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda CX-5 and 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…