2012 • BMW
X3
BMW X3 2012Overall Score70.5/100
2012 BMW X3 vs 2012 Mazda CX-5 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Mazda
CX-5
Mazda CX-5 2.2 (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score70.75/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-5
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Performance
BMW X3SpecificationMazda CX-5
9,9 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
195 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
143 HPPower150 HP
360 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
BMW X3SpecificationMazda CX-5
DieselFuel typeDiesel
67 ltFuel tank56 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption5,4 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption4,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
BMW X3SpecificationMazda CX-5
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/60 R17 VTyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
BMW X3SpecificationMazda CX-5
4648 mmLength4555 mm
1881 mmWidth1840 mm
1661 mmHeight1710 mm
1660 KgWeight1445 Kg
2810 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 BMW X3 and 2012 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…