DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mazda CX-5 vs 2017 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeKia
CX-5ModelOptima
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
197 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
165 HPPower163 HP
210 NmTorque196 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption10,0 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/60 R16; 215/55 R17; 235/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4555 mmLength4855 mm
1840 mmWidth1860 mm
1710 mmHeight1465 mm
1315 KgWeight1455 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2805 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mazda CX-5 and 2017 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…