2012 • Mazda
CX-5
Mazda CX-5 2.0 (160 Hp) 2012Overall Score63.25/100
2012 Mazda CX-5 vs 2012 Volvo S40 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 2.0i (145 Hp) 2012Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-5
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CX-5SpecificationVolvo S40
MazdaMakeVolvo
CX-5ModelS40
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda CX-5SpecificationVolvo S40
10,5 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
197 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
160 HPPower145 HP
208 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CX-5SpecificationVolvo S40
PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption10,2 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Mazda CX-5SpecificationVolvo S40
4555 mmLength4468 mm
1840 mmWidth1770 mm
1710 mmHeight1452 mm
1488 KgWeight1296 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Mazda CX-5 and 2012 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableMazda 6 vs Mazda CX-52012 and 2012 model years
VSImage unavailableMazda 3 vs Mazda CX-52012 and 2012 model years
VSImage unavailableVolkswagen Scirocco vs Mazda CX-52012 and 2012 model years
VSImage unavailableSubaru Forester vs Mazda CX-52012 and 2012 model years
VSImage unavailableFord Mondeo vs Mazda CX-52012 and 2012 model yearsComments are loading…