DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda CX-5 vs 2012 Volkswagen Amarok Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeVolkswagen
CX-5ModelAmarok
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h12,9-13.3 s
197 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
160 HPPower140 HP
208 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank80 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4555 mmLength5254 mm
1840 mmWidth1944 mm
1710 mmHeight1834 mm
1488 KgWeight1861 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase3095 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda CX-5 and 2012 Volkswagen Amarok approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…