2012 • Mazda
CX-5
Mazda CX-5 2.0 (160 Hp) 2012Overall Score63.25/100
2012 Mazda CX-5 vs 2012 Lincoln MKZ Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Lincoln
MKZ
Lincoln MKZ 2.0 (188 Hp) 2012Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-5
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CX-5SpecificationLincoln MKZ
MazdaMakeLincoln
CX-5ModelMKZ
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda CX-5SpecificationLincoln MKZ
10,5 s0–100 km/h—
197 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
160 HPPower141 HP
208 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CX-5SpecificationLincoln MKZ
PetrolFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
58 ltFuel tank51 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Mazda CX-5SpecificationLincoln MKZ
4555 mmLength4930 mm
1840 mmWidth1864 mm
1710 mmHeight1476 mm
1488 KgWeight1746 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Mazda CX-5 and 2012 Lincoln MKZ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableMazda 6 vs Mazda CX-52012 and 2012 model years
VSImage unavailableMazda 3 vs Mazda CX-52012 and 2012 model years
VSImage unavailableVolkswagen Scirocco vs Mazda CX-52012 and 2012 model years
VSImage unavailableSubaru Forester vs Mazda CX-52012 and 2012 model years
VSImage unavailableFord Mondeo vs Mazda CX-52012 and 2012 model yearsComments are loading…