DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda CX-5 vs 2012 Great Wall Steed Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeGreat Wall
CX-5ModelSteed
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
197 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1996 cc
160 HPPower139 HP
208 NmTorque305 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption—
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,6 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4555 mmLength5040 mm
1840 mmWidth1800 mm
1710 mmHeight1730 mm
1488 KgWeight—
2700 mmWheelbase3050 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda CX-5 and 2012 Great Wall Steed approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…