DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda CX-5 vs 2012 Fiat Freemont Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFiat
CX-5ModelFreemont
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
197 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
160 HPPower140 HP
208 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank77 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption8,3 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/65 R17; 225/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4555 mmLength4910 mm
1840 mmWidth1878 mm
1710 mmHeight1705 mm
1488 KgWeight1949 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2890 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda CX-5 and 2012 Fiat Freemont approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…