DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mazda CX-3 vs 2017 Honda WR-V Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda WR-V

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeHonda
CX-3ModelWR-V
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h—
172 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
105 HPPower100 HP
270 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank40 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption—
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
ATTransmission—
18Tyre size195/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4275 mmLength3999 mm
1765 mmWidth1734 mm
1535 mmHeight1601 mm
1295 kgWeight1176-1204 Kg
350 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2555 mm

Additional Features

Mazda CX-3Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistCruise ControlTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetooth
Honda WR-V

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mazda CX-3 and 2017 Honda WR-V approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda WR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…