DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Honda WR-V vs 2017 Mazda CX-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda WR-V

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.5–67.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeMazda
WR-VModelCX-3
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,9 s
0 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
100 HPPower105 HP
200 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
40 ltFuel tank48 lt
—Urban consumption5,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,9 lt
—Average consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—TransmissionAT
195/60 R16Tyre size18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3999 mmLength4275 mm
1734 mmWidth1765 mm
1601 mmHeight1535 mm
1176-1204 KgWeight1295 kg
—Luggage capacity350 lt
2555 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Honda WR-V

No additional feature records are available.

Mazda CX-3Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistCruise ControlTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Honda WR-V and 2017 Mazda CX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda WR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…