DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mazda CX-3 vs 2017 Mini Hatch Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Hatch

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMini
CX-3ModelHatch
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,1 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
177 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1496 cc
105 HPPower116 HP
270 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank44 lt
4,4 ltUrban consumption4,4 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption3,2 lt
4,1 ltAverage consumption3,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
ManualTransmission—
18Tyre size175/65 R15 84H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4275 mmLength3982 mm
1765 mmWidth1727 mm
1535 mmHeight1425 mm
1200 kgWeight1190 Kg
350 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2567 mm

Additional Features

Mazda CX-3Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistCruise ControlTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetooth
Mini Hatch

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mazda CX-3 and 2017 Mini Hatch approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Hatch leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…