DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda CX-3 vs 2016 Seat Toledo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Toledo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSeat
CX-3ModelToledo
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,1 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
177 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
105 HPPower115 HP
270 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank55 lt
4,4 ltUrban consumption5,4 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption3,6 lt
4,1 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
ManualTransmission—
18Tyre size185/60 R15; 215/45 R16; 215/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4275 mmLength4482 mm
1765 mmWidth1706 mm
1535 mmHeight1461 mm
1200 kgWeight1280 Kg
350 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2602 mm

Additional Features

Mazda CX-3Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetooth
Seat Toledo

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda CX-3 and 2016 Seat Toledo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Toledo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…