2016 • Seat
Toledo
Seat Toledo 1.6 TDI (115 Hp) 2016Overall Score67.5/100
2016 Seat Toledo vs 2016 Mazda CX-3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Mazda
CX-3
Mazda CX-3 Motion 2016 1.5 105 HPOverall Score67.25/100
WINNER
Seat Toledo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
67.5–67.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Seat ToledoSpecificationMazda CX-3
SeatMakeMazda
ToledoModelCX-3
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Seat ToledoSpecificationMazda CX-3
10,0 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
201 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
115 HPPower105 HP
250 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Seat ToledoSpecificationMazda CX-3
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank48 lt
5,4 ltUrban consumption4,4 lt
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption4,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Seat ToledoSpecificationMazda CX-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
—TransmissionManual
185/60 R15; 215/45 R16; 215/40 R17Tyre size18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Seat ToledoSpecificationMazda CX-3
4482 mmLength4275 mm
1706 mmWidth1765 mm
1461 mmHeight1535 mm
1280 KgWeight1200 kg
—Luggage capacity350 lt
2602 mmWheelbase—
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Seat Toledo and 2016 Mazda CX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Seat Toledo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…