DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mazda CX-3 vs 2017 Volvo V90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda CX-3SpecificationVolvo V90
MazdaMakeVolvo
CX-3ModelV90
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda CX-3SpecificationVolvo V90
8,7 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
200 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
204 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda CX-3SpecificationVolvo V90
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
44 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,4 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda CX-3SpecificationVolvo V90
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda CX-3SpecificationVolvo V90
4275 mmLength4936 mm
1765 mmWidth1879 mm
1535 mmHeight1475 mm
1235 KgWeight—
2570 mmWheelbase2941 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mazda CX-3 and 2017 Volvo V90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…