2017 • Volvo
V60
Volvo V60 2.0 D4 (163 Hp) 2017Overall Score69.75/100
2017 Volvo V60 vs 2017 Mazda CX-3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Mazda
CX-3
Mazda CX-3 2.0i (150 Hp) 2017Overall Score70.5/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V60SpecificationMazda CX-3
VolvoMakeMazda
V60ModelCX-3
2017Model year2017
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V60SpecificationMazda CX-3
9,4 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
163 HPPower150 HP
400 NmTorque204 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V60SpecificationMazda CX-3
DieselFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank44 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo V60SpecificationMazda CX-3
4635 mmLength4275 mm
1825 mmWidth1765 mm
1484 mmHeight1535 mm
1731 KgWeight1235 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase2570 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Volvo V60 and 2017 Mazda CX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…