DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mazda CX-3 vs 2017 Volvo V60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda CX-3SpecificationVolvo V60
MazdaMakeVolvo
CX-3ModelV60
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda CX-3SpecificationVolvo V60
8,7 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
150 HPPower163 HP
204 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda CX-3SpecificationVolvo V60
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
44 ltFuel tank67 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda CX-3SpecificationVolvo V60
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda CX-3SpecificationVolvo V60
4275 mmLength4635 mm
1765 mmWidth1825 mm
1535 mmHeight1484 mm
1235 KgWeight1731 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mazda CX-3 and 2017 Volvo V60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…