DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda CX-3 vs 2016 Ford S-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFord
CX-3ModelS-Max
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeMPV
5Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h13,4 s
192 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
204 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 245/45 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4275 mmLength4796 mm
1765 mmWidth1916 mm
1535 mmHeight1953 mm
1155 KgWeight1725 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2849 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda CX-3 and 2016 Ford S-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…