DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda CX-3 vs 2016 Citroen Jumpy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeCitroen
CX-3ModelJumpy
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeMPV
5Seats9
5Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h13,4 s
192 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
120 HPPower128 HP
204 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank80 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,0 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4275 mmLength4805 mm
1765 mmWidth1895 mm
1535 mmHeight1942 mm
1155 KgWeight1913 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda CX-3 and 2016 Citroen Jumpy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…