DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda CX-3 vs 2016 Chevrolet Orlando Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeChevrolet
CX-3ModelOrlando
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
192 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
120 HPPower131 HP
204 NmTorque315 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank64 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/R60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4275 mmLength4652 mm
1765 mmWidth1836 mm
1535 mmHeight1633 mm
1155 KgWeight1655 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda CX-3 and 2016 Chevrolet Orlando approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…