DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Mazda Cronos vs 1995 Volvo 850 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Cronos

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeVolvo
CronosModel850
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats4+1
4Doors5

Performance

195 km/hTop speed240 km/h
1845 ccEngine displacement2000 cc
140 HPPower143 HP
157 NmTorque0 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption9,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 89 STyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4695 mmLength—
1770 mmWidth—
1400 mmHeight—
1170 KgWeight—
2610 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Mazda Cronos and 1995 Volvo 850 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…