DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Audi 80 vs 1995 Mazda Cronos Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Cronos

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

61.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationMazda Cronos
AudiMakeMazda
80ModelCronos
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationMazda Cronos
9,8 s0–100 km/h—
197 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1845 cc
140 HPPower140 HP
185 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationMazda Cronos
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationMazda Cronos
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R14 89 S
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationMazda Cronos
4482 mmLength4695 mm
1695 mmWidth1770 mm
1408 mmHeight1400 mm
1310 KgWeight1170 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Audi 80 and 1995 Mazda Cronos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…