DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Mazda Cronos vs 1995 Kia Elan Sport Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Cronos

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeKia
CronosModelElan Sport
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,7 s
195 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1845 ccEngine displacement1793 cc
140 HPPower151 HP
157 NmTorque186 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank46 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 89 STyre size205/55 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4695 mmLength3880 mm
1770 mmWidth1730 mm
1400 mmHeight1270 mm
1170 KgWeight1015 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2250 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Mazda Cronos and 1995 Kia Elan Sport approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…