DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda Capella vs 2000 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Capella

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda CapellaSpecificationBMW Z3
MazdaMakeBMW
CapellaModelZ3
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

Mazda CapellaSpecificationBMW Z3
—0–100 km/h10,4 s
0 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1895 cc
140 HPPower118 HP
186 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda CapellaSpecificationBMW Z3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption11 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda CapellaSpecificationBMW Z3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size225/50 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda CapellaSpecificationBMW Z3
4575 mmLength4050 mm
1695 mmWidth1740 mm
1440 mmHeight1288 mm
1210 KgWeight1220 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda Capella and 2000 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Capella leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…