1996 • Mazda
Capella
Mazda Capella 1.8i (97 Hp) 1996Overall Score40.25/100
1996 Mazda Capella vs 2000 Renault Scenic Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Renault
Scenic
Renault Scenic 1.9 TDI (98 Hp) 2000Overall Score41.25/100
WINNER
Renault Scenic
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
40.25–41.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CapellaSpecificationRenault Scenic
MazdaMakeRenault
CapellaModelScenic
1996Model year2000
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats4+1
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda CapellaSpecificationRenault Scenic
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
97 HPPower98 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda CapellaSpecificationRenault Scenic
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
185/70 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
Dimensions
Mazda CapellaSpecificationRenault Scenic
4590 mmLength—
1690 mmWidth—
1430 mmHeight—
1240 KgWeight—
2575 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Mazda Capella and 2000 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSToyota Corolla vs Mazda Capella2000 and 1996 model yearsVSRenault Scenic vs Mazda Capella2000 and 1996 model yearsImage unavailableVSSsangYong Istana vs Mazda Capella2000 and 1996 model years
VSHonda Partner vs Mazda Capella2000 and 1996 model years
VSNissan Primera vs Mazda Capella2000 and 1996 model yearsComments are loading…