2000 • Renault
Scenic
Renault Scenic 1.9 TDI (98 Hp) 2000Overall Score41.25/100
2000 Renault Scenic vs 1996 Mazda Capella Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Mazda
Capella
Mazda Capella 1.8i (97 Hp) 1996Overall Score40.25/100
WINNER
Renault Scenic
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
41.25–40.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault ScenicSpecificationMazda Capella
RenaultMakeMazda
ScenicModelCapella
2000Model year1996
MinivanBody typeEstate
4+1Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Renault ScenicSpecificationMazda Capella
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
98 HPPower97 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Renault ScenicSpecificationMazda Capella
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
Dimensions
Renault ScenicSpecificationMazda Capella
—Length4590 mm
—Width1690 mm
—Height1430 mm
—Weight1240 Kg
—Wheelbase2575 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Renault Scenic and 1996 Mazda Capella approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSRenault Scenic vs Renault Scenic1999 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVSSsangYong Korando vs Renault Scenic1999 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVSSsangYong Istana vs Renault Scenic1999 and 2000 model years
VSNissan Primera vs Renault Scenic1999 and 2000 model years
VSPeugeot 406 vs Renault Scenic1999 and 2000 model yearsComments are loading…