DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mazda BT-50 vs 2010 Kia Carnival Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Carnival

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeKia
BT-50ModelCarnival
2010Model year2010
Pick-upBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
158 km/hTop speed197 km/h
2500 ccEngine displacement2656 cc
143 HPPower189 HP
330 NmTorque249 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption12,3 lt
8,0 ltExtra-urban consumption7,0 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size225/70 R16; 235/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5075 mmLength4810 mm
1805 mmWidth1985 mm
1750 mmHeight1760 mm
1940 KgWeight2040 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2890 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mazda BT-50 and 2010 Kia Carnival approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Carnival leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…