DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Honda CR-V vs 2010 Mazda BT-50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda CR-V

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeMazda
CR-VModelBT-50
2010Model year2010
CrossoverBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
190 km/hTop speed158 km/h
2354 ccEngine displacement2500 cc
166 HPPower143 HP
220 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,0 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/65 R17Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4530 mmLength5075 mm
1820 mmWidth1805 mm
1680 mmHeight1750 mm
1631 KgWeight1940 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Honda CR-V and 2010 Mazda BT-50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda CR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…