DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mazda BT-50 vs 2010 Honda CR-V Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda CR-V

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeHonda
BT-50ModelCR-V
2010Model year2010
Pick-upBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
158 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2500 ccEngine displacement2354 cc
143 HPPower166 HP
330 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank58 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
8,0 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size225/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5075 mmLength4530 mm
1805 mmWidth1820 mm
1750 mmHeight1680 mm
1940 KgWeight1631 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mazda BT-50 and 2010 Honda CR-V approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda CR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…