DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Mazda BT-50 vs 2009 Subaru Outback Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Outback

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSubaru
BT-50ModelOutback
2009Model year2009
Pick-upBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
158 km/hTop speed199 km/h
2500 ccEngine displacement2457 cc
143 HPPower173 HP
330 NmTorque229 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank0 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
8,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears4
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size215/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5075 mmLength4730 mm
1805 mmWidth1770 mm
1750 mmHeight1545 mm
1940 KgWeight1485 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Mazda BT-50 and 2009 Subaru Outback approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Outback leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…