DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Subaru Outback vs 2009 Mazda BT-50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Outback

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeMazda
OutbackModelBT-50
2009Model year2009
EstateBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
199 km/hTop speed158 km/h
2457 ccEngine displacement2500 cc
173 HPPower143 HP
229 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,0 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears5
215/55 R17Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4730 mmLength5075 mm
1770 mmWidth1805 mm
1545 mmHeight1750 mm
1485 KgWeight1940 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Subaru Outback and 2009 Mazda BT-50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Outback leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…