1996 • Mazda
Bongo
Mazda Bongo 2.5 D (120 Hp) 1996Overall Score63.75/100
1996 Mazda Bongo vs 1996 Audi Coupe Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Audi
Coupe
Audi Coupe 2.0 16V (140 Hp) 1996Overall Score63.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Bongo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
63.75–63.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda BongoSpecificationAudi Coupe
MazdaMakeAudi
BongoModelCoupe
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeCoupe
—Seats5
4Doors2
Performance
Mazda BongoSpecificationAudi Coupe
—0–100 km/h9,4 s
0 km/hTop speed207 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
120 HPPower140 HP
310 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda BongoSpecificationAudi Coupe
DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption11,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,9 lt
—Average consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda BongoSpecificationAudi Coupe
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
195/70 R15; 215/65 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda BongoSpecificationAudi Coupe
4585 mmLength4366 mm
1690 mmWidth1716 mm
1960 mmHeight1375 mm
—Weight1270 Kg
2920 mmWheelbase2556 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Mazda Bongo and 1996 Audi Coupe approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Bongo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…