DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda Bongo vs 1996 Dodge Neon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Bongo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

63.75–63.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeDodge
BongoModelNeon
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeSedan
—Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1996 cc
120 HPPower132 HP
310 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank42 lt
—Average consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
195/70 R15; 215/65 R15Tyre size165/80R13

Dimensions

4585 mmLength4364 mm
1690 mmWidth1708 mm
1960 mmHeight1391 mm
—Weight1061 Kg
2920 mmWheelbase2642 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda Bongo and 1996 Dodge Neon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Bongo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…