1996 • Mazda
Bongo
Mazda Bongo 2.0 D (71 Hp) 1996Overall Score51.5/100
1996 Mazda Bongo vs 1996 Seat Toledo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Seat
Toledo
Seat Toledo 1.9 TDI (90 Hp) 1996Overall Score52.25/100
WINNER
Seat Toledo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
51.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda BongoSpecificationSeat Toledo
MazdaMakeSeat
BongoModelToledo
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeSedan
—Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mazda BongoSpecificationSeat Toledo
—0–100 km/h12,7 s
0 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
71 HPPower90 HP
128 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda BongoSpecificationSeat Toledo
DieselFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption5,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption4,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda BongoSpecificationSeat Toledo
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size185/60 R14
Dimensions
Mazda BongoSpecificationSeat Toledo
4230 mmLength4321 mm
1630 mmWidth1662 mm
1970 mmHeight1421 mm
—Weight1080 Kg
2220 mmWheelbase2471 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Mazda Bongo and 1996 Seat Toledo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Seat Toledo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…