1996 • Skoda
Octavia
Skoda Octavia 1.9 TDI (90 Hp) 1996Overall Score52.25/100
1996 Skoda Octavia vs 1996 Mazda Bongo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Mazda
Bongo
Mazda Bongo 2.0 D (71 Hp) 1996Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Skoda Octavia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
52.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda OctaviaSpecificationMazda Bongo
SkodaMakeMazda
OctaviaModelBongo
1996Model year1996
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats—
5Doors4
Performance
Skoda OctaviaSpecificationMazda Bongo
13,7 s0–100 km/h—
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower71 HP
210 NmTorque128 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda OctaviaSpecificationMazda Bongo
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank48 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption—
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,0 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda OctaviaSpecificationMazda Bongo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears—
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Skoda OctaviaSpecificationMazda Bongo
4511 mmLength4230 mm
1731 mmWidth1630 mm
1457 mmHeight1970 mm
1305 KgWeight—
2512 mmWheelbase2220 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Skoda Octavia and 1996 Mazda Bongo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Octavia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…