DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda Bongo vs 1996 Seat Cordoba Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Cordoba

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

51.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSeat
BongoModelCordoba
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeSedan
—Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,5 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
71 HPPower90 HP
128 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption6,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size185/60 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4230 mmLength4109 mm
1630 mmWidth1640 mm
1970 mmHeight1408 mm
—Weight1055 Kg
2220 mmWheelbase2440 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda Bongo and 1996 Seat Cordoba approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Cordoba leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…