DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda B-series vs 2005 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V50

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

55.5–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeVolvo
B-seriesModelV50
2004Model year2005
Pick-upBody typeEstate
2Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,7 s
130 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
78 HPPower140 HP
168 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption13,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
—Average consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/80 R16Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

5020 mmLength4522 mm
1695 mmWidth1845 mm
1740 mmHeight1457 mm
1205 KgWeight1335 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda B-series and 2005 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…