DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Volvo V50 vs 2004 Mazda B-series Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V50

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.5–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeMazda
V50ModelB-series
2005Model year2004
EstateBody typePick-up
5Seats2
5Doors4

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed130 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
140 HPPower78 HP
220 NmTorque168 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/80 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4522 mmLength5020 mm
1845 mmWidth1695 mm
1457 mmHeight1740 mm
1335 KgWeight1205 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Volvo V50 and 2004 Mazda B-series approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…