DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda B-series vs 2003 Nissan X-Trail Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan X-Trail

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeNissan
B-seriesModelX-Trail
2003Model year2003
Pick-upBody typeSUV
4Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
130 km/hTop speed191 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
109 HPPower165 HP
266 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption12,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt
—Average consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/80 R16Tyre size215/65 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

5020 mmLength4455 mm
1695 mmWidth1765 mm
1740 mmHeight1675 mm
1205 KgWeight1470 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda B-series and 2003 Nissan X-Trail approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan X-Trail leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…