DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mazda Axela vs 2013 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Axela

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeRenault
AxelaModelScenic
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,3 s
180 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
114 HPPower130 HP
140 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption5,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
195/65R15Tyre size205/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4405 mmLength4366 mm
1745 mmWidth1845 mm
1465 mmHeight—
1240 KgWeight1505 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mazda Axela and 2013 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Axela leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…