2013 • Chevrolet
Trax
Chevrolet Trax LS 2013 1.6 T 115 HPOverall Score64.25/100
2013 Chevrolet Trax vs 2013 Mazda Axela Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Mazda
Axela
Mazda Axela 1.5 16V Sport (114 Hp) 2013Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Chevrolet Trax
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
64.25–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Chevrolet TraxSpecificationMazda Axela
ChevroletMakeMazda
TraxModelAxela
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Chevrolet TraxSpecificationMazda Axela
12,3 s0–100 km/h—
174 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
115 HPPower114 HP
155 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Chevrolet TraxSpecificationMazda Axela
PetrolFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption—
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Chevrolet TraxSpecificationMazda Axela
4x2DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size195/65R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Chevrolet TraxSpecificationMazda Axela
4248 mmLength4405 mm
1776 mmWidth1745 mm
1647 mmHeight1465 mm
1287 kgWeight1240 Kg
356 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2640 mm
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Chevrolet Trax and 2013 Mazda Axela approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chevrolet Trax leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…