DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda Atenza vs 2003 Dodge Caravan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Atenza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeDodge
AtenzaModelCaravan
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,5 s
0 km/hTop speed177 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2429 cc
175 HPPower152 HP
220 NmTorque226 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank76 lt
—Urban consumption11,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
215/45 R17 87 VTyre size205/65R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4670 mmLength4803 mm
1780 mmWidth1996 mm
1435 mmHeight1750 mm
1355 KgWeight1820 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2878 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda Atenza and 2003 Dodge Caravan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Atenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…