DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Land Rover Freelander vs 2003 Mazda Atenza Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Atenza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMazda
FreelanderModelAtenza
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h—
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
177 HPPower175 HP
240 NmTorque220 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank64 lt
17,2 ltUrban consumption—
9,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
215/65 R16Tyre size215/45 R17 87 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4433 mmLength4670 mm
1809 mmWidth1780 mm
1709 mmHeight1435 mm
1550 KgWeight1355 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Land Rover Freelander and 2003 Mazda Atenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Atenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…