1990 • Mazda
929
Mazda 929 3.0 i V6 (170 Hp) 1990Overall Score64.5/100
1990 Mazda 929 vs 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Oldsmobile
Cutlass
Oldsmobile Cutlass 3.1 V6 (141 Hp) 1990Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Oldsmobile Cutlass
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 929SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
MazdaMakeOldsmobile
929ModelCutlass
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
6Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mazda 929SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
8,6 s0–100 km/h—
205 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2954 ccEngine displacement3135 cc
170 HPPower141 HP
240 NmTorque251 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 929SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank63 lt
14,1 ltUrban consumption16 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
10 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 929SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R15 93 HTyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 929SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
4690 mmLength4921 mm
1695 mmWidth1804 mm
1425 mmHeight1391 mm
1460 KgWeight1450 Kg
2710 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Mazda 929 and 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…