1990 • Ford
Aerostar
Ford Aerostar 3.0i V6 (147 Hp) 1990Overall Score65.25/100
1990 Ford Aerostar vs 1990 Mazda 929 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Mazda
929
Mazda 929 3.0 i V6 (170 Hp) 1990Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Ford Aerostar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford AerostarSpecificationMazda 929
FordMakeMazda
AerostarModel929
1990Model year1990
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats6
4Doors4
Performance
Ford AerostarSpecificationMazda 929
—0–100 km/h8,6 s
160 km/hTop speed205 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2954 cc
147 HPPower170 HP
224 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford AerostarSpecificationMazda 929
PetrolFuel typePetrol
79 ltFuel tank70 lt
16 ltUrban consumption14,1 lt
11 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
—Average consumption10 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford AerostarSpecificationMazda 929
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/75 R14Tyre size205/65 R15 93 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford AerostarSpecificationMazda 929
4440 mmLength4690 mm
1820 mmWidth1695 mm
1850 mmHeight1425 mm
1530 KgWeight1460 Kg
3020 mmWheelbase2710 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Ford Aerostar and 1990 Mazda 929 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Aerostar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…