DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Mazda 929 vs 1990 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFord
929ModelTaurus
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
6Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h—
205 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2954 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
170 HPPower142 HP
240 NmTorque217 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank61 lt
14,1 ltUrban consumption15 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
10 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R15 93 HTyre size205/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4690 mmLength4785 mm
1695 mmWidth1796 mm
1425 mmHeight1382 mm
1460 KgWeight1372 Kg
2710 mmWheelbase2692 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Mazda 929 and 1990 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…