1990 • Mazda
929
Mazda 929 3.0 i V6 (170 Hp) 1990Overall Score64.5/100
1990 Mazda 929 vs 1990 Ford Aerostar Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Ford
Aerostar
Ford Aerostar 3.0i V6 (147 Hp) 1990Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Ford Aerostar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 929SpecificationFord Aerostar
MazdaMakeFord
929ModelAerostar
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeMinivan
6Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mazda 929SpecificationFord Aerostar
8,6 s0–100 km/h—
205 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2954 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
170 HPPower147 HP
240 NmTorque224 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 929SpecificationFord Aerostar
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank79 lt
14,1 ltUrban consumption16 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption11 lt
10 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 929SpecificationFord Aerostar
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15 93 HTyre size205/75 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 929SpecificationFord Aerostar
4690 mmLength4440 mm
1695 mmWidth1820 mm
1425 mmHeight1850 mm
1460 KgWeight1530 Kg
2710 mmWheelbase3020 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Mazda 929 and 1990 Ford Aerostar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Aerostar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…