2001 • Mazda
626
Mazda 626 2.5 V6 (167 Hp) 2001Overall Score63.25/100
2001 Mazda 626 vs 2001 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2001 • Land Rover
Range Rover
Land Rover Range Rover Range 2.5 D (136 Hp) 2001Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 626
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
63.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 626SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
MazdaMakeLand Rover
626ModelRange Rover
2001Model year2001
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Mazda 626SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
9,3 s0–100 km/h14,3 s
198 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
167 HPPower136 HP
218 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 626SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank100 lt
—Urban consumption12,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,9 lt
—Average consumption10,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 626SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 626SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
4745 mmLength4713 mm
1760 mmWidth1853 mm
1425 mmHeight1817 mm
1425 KgWeight2115 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2745 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2001 Mazda 626 and 2001 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…