DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2001 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

62.25–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMazda
Range RoverModel626
2001Model year2001
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

14,3 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
185 km/hTop speed198 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
136 HPPower167 HP
270 NmTorque218 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank64 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption—
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4713 mmLength4745 mm
1853 mmWidth1760 mm
1817 mmHeight1425 mm
2115 KgWeight1425 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Land Rover Range Rover and 2001 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…