DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1991 Mazda 626 vs 1991 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 626SpecificationOpel Omega
MazdaMakeOpel
626ModelOmega
1991Model year1991
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 626SpecificationOpel Omega
9,7 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
115 HPPower99 HP
170 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 626SpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank75 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 626SpecificationOpel Omega
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15 88 HTyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

Mazda 626SpecificationOpel Omega
4695 mmLength4740 mm
1750 mmWidth1760 mm
1390 mmHeight1445 mm
1185 KgWeight1235 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1991 Mazda 626 and 1991 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…