DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1991 Opel Omega vs 1991 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda 626
OpelMakeMazda
OmegaModel626
1991Model year1991
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda 626
—0–100 km/h9,7 s
190 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
99 HPPower115 HP
170 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda 626
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Average consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda 626
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/60 R15 88 H
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda 626
4740 mmLength4695 mm
1760 mmWidth1750 mm
1445 mmHeight1390 mm
1235 KgWeight1185 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1991 Opel Omega and 1991 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…